If You Dvr Show, Does It Give It Ratings?

Wind power is the solution to our problems.

No, it is not certain. Opponents of wind power, these antagonists of like an absolute natural and sustainable living dar. The "concrete jungles" and "steel giants" who are noisy and sound-emitting infra in the landscape to be a major threat stylized. All supporters are either bought or advocate the industrialized world - so of course proWIND.

is no way here to say. It is in this debate the pros and cons to weigh. This should be discussed with exaggerations or subjective comments or with fear. Each problem must be clearly presented and then it can be either refuted or perceived. This consists proWIND goal. Proponents of wind energy have weighed these advantages and disadvantages and therefore vote for wind power. Neither bought, nor stupid nor children are at work here.

is wind power, as in a previous Review noted, not the solution to our "problems". Our current lifestyle consumes more resources than we have available and does more damage than our planet can sustain, nature takes out of balance, because it can not last forever "insert" (buffer). Wind power is a part of many columns that accompany these "turnaround". To get out of fossil energy (and that includes, ultimately, nuclear energy) to fold, we need many approaches. The column of wind energy is clean energy. Austria and Europe has enough "clean" resources to produce energy sustainably. Biomass, wind, photovoltaic and solar thermal are those "energy" that we must use.

photovoltaics is in our part of a decentralized form of energy. On rooftops many PV panels generate energy. Large systems are only of limited use. Biomass is indeed there, but is used widely and in large quantities is also problematic (removal of nutrients on fields). Wind energy is known. All these forms of energy are our future. The available in this way power is to be transported over a resilient power supply across Europe and between countries - and not only that corporations make money - but to enable a balance between the states and energies (In Lower Austria is the wind, the sun shines in Spain - more banal).

part, this was defined in an EU Strategy:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/green-paper-energy/doc/2006_03_08_gp_document_de.pdf

http://europa.eu/rapid pressReleasesAction.do? reference = IP/10/1492 & format = HTML & aged = 0 & language = en & s = guiLanguage

Further steps are to see in ourselves. In Austria, the area is to save the most energy - the building sector. The framework for Austria as an incentive:

environment. live ministry .at/filemanager/download/70586 /

The most important point, however, is the rethinking of their own position on energy- and Ressorucenverbrauch. We consume too much power and consume too much. Where we used to spent a larger proportion of our income for life support (food), this proportion has fallen considerably (we know the debate about the income of farmers) - the more we give now for TV's, iPods, iPad, iPhones, etc. from. Faster, higher, stronger. Not increase the sales by 10% every year, prices fall immediately into the abyss. This is neither healthy nor constructive. Accordingly, namely increasing our energy consumption. Are we for wind turbines, we should also think about whether it really makes sense to drive every mile by car, to buying new equipment and to identify ourselves through consumption.

For some, a very philosophical approach, however, is to remember one thing - if we build 100 wind turbines and consume more energy, even these 100 wind turbines bald zuwenig sein. Wenn wir 4 Windräder bauen können wir Teil einer zukünftig sauberen, überregionalen Lösung werden. Wir leben, wir konsumieren, wir "verbrauchen"..."abputzen" ist da wohl nur schwer möglich. 

Für Rückfragen, Anliegen, Diskussionen sind wir gerne offen - prowind@gmx.at!